ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Impact of Anastomotic Leaks on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following McKeown Esophagectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of anastomotic leak (AL) on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study investigated whether AL influences the long-term survival of patients with ESCC following McKeown esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsAn original database was queried to identify patients with ESCC who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between 2012 and 2020 at a high-volume cancer center. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors.
resultsA total of 1614 patients were included, of whom 16.9% developed AL. In patients without neoadjuvant therapy, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 55.8% and 62.0%, and the 5-year DFS was 48.7% and 59.1%, respectively (OS: p = 0.37, DFS: p = 0.046). In the neoadjuvant cohort, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 57.9% and 63.2%, and the 5-year DFS was 55.4% and 58.8%, respectively (OS: p = 0.48, DFS: p = 0.78). Moreover, AL significantly increased the risk of distant recurrence in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.023).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that AL negatively influences DFS in patients without neoadjuvant therapy, but does not significantly affect long-term survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Intensive treatment and follow-up plan should be considered when patients without neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.