ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Critical issues in the use of edaravone for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning a distance for the clustering of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Disrupted astrocyte-neuron metabolic coupling in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Edaravone, along with riluzole, is a key treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with evidence supporting its efficacy in slowing disease progression, particularly in patients with early-stage ALS. Despite its approval and increasing clinical use, several critical questions about its use remain unanswered: Can edaravone be effective as monotherapy? Is it beneficial for patients who fall outside the inclusion criteria of pivotal trials? What is the optimal duration of treatment as ALS progresses? In addition, does edaravone provide clinical benefit to patients with familial ALS? Answering these questions is essential to optimize the use of edaravone in clinical practice and to further our understanding of its role in the treatment of ALS. This review synthesizes the current evidence to address these questions and identifies areas that require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.