ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardio-Oncology Care.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Cardio-oncology Service.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Social Determinants of Health in Cardio Oncology, from Evidence To Action: Translating Concepts into Clinical Practice Through Implementation Science.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review examines racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in cardio-oncology care, evaluating current evidence and proposing evidence-based strategies to address inequities in cardiovascular care for cancer patients. RECENT
findingsSignificant disparities exist in cardio-oncology outcomes and access across populations. Racial and ethnic minoritized groups face higher cardiovascular mortality and increased cardiotoxicity risks during cancer treatment. These populations also preset with more advanced-stage cancer diagnoses and increased burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Social vulnerability indices strongly correlate with worse outcomes, while geographic location and environmental factors create additional risks. Rural populations particularly struggle with access to specialized care and clinical trials. Multiple factors contribute to disparities in cardio-oncology, including social determinants of health, disproportionate burden of cardiovascular risk factors, barriers to access, and environmental exposures. Key solutions include expanding access to subspecialty care, creation of collaborations between academic centers and community hospitals, particularly those in underserved communities, enhancing community engagement and public health education, improving clinical trial representation, increasing workforce diversity, and enhancing cultural competency. These findings emphasize the need for systematic healthcare delivery changes and resource allocation to achieve equitable cardio-oncology care for all populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.