ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Contraceptive practices in Québec in relation to immigration: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Québec Population Health Survey.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arabic speaking women's experience of postpartum contraceptive counselling in Sweden.Reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the association between immigration status and women's contraceptive practices based on population data from government surveys.
methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted on the Quebec Population Health Survey (2014-2015), which aimed to represent 98.8% of the population of Quebec aged 15 years and older through stratified sampling and data weighting (response rate of 61%). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare contraceptive practices between immigrant and Canadian-born women. Two dependent variables were considered: (1) women who used contraception vs. no contraceptive method of any kind, and (2) among women who used contraception, those who used methods that required them to access health care (birth control pill, IUD, or tubal ligation) vs. women who used other methods (condom, coitus interruptus, other).
resultsThe logistic regression results revealed a strong association between immigration status and contraceptive practices, at two levels: (1) immigrant women had lower odds to use contraception than Canadian-born women; and (2) of the women who use contraception, immigrants had lower odds than those born in Canada to use feminine medical contraception. These findings held true for immigrant women regardless of the number of years they have spent in Canada. Women who lived in low-income households or who had not had a medical consultation for more than one year also had lower odds to use feminine medical contraception.
conclusionBarriers in access to contraceptive care interfere with women's reproductive health and autonomy. The lower odds for immigrant women to use contraception, and particularly the most effective methods, suggest that their contraceptive care needs are at least partially unmet or inadequately addressed. This is concerning given that other studies show no differences in fertility intention between immigrant and Canadian-born women, and high rates of abortion for immigrant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.