ArticleOdontology2025
Accuracy of CBCT with blooming artifact reduction filter on the measurements of dentin thickness in root canals with radiodense materials: an in vitro study.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precision of dentin thickness evaluations in the presence of artifacts is vital, as inaccuracies may increase the risk of over-preparation and consequent structural damage to the tooth. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of residual dentin thickness measurements in CBCT images of teeth with high-density intracanal materials, utilizing the blooming artifact reduction (BAR) filter. Twelve single-rooted human teeth were selected. Axial cuts were performed, and the root thickness was measured at the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces, which represented the reference standard. CBCT scans were acquired of each specimen in 5 different settings: empty root canals (ERC), gutta-percha cone (GPC), gutta-percha and endodontic sealer (GPC + S), fiberglass post (FGP), and metal post (MP). Measurements were performed before and after the application of the BAR filter in the e-vol DX software. ANOVA with the Dunnet's post hoc test was used for comparison between measurements in CBCT images and the reference standard. The BAR filter did not influence the measurements in teeth with ERC, GPC, and FGP (p > 0.05). In teeth with GPC + S, the measurements with the BAR filter had no difference from the reference standard (p < 0.05). CBCT images measurements were comparable to the reference standard in the ERC, GPC, and FGP groups. BAR filter was restricted to the GPC + S group in the cervical third, and the MP group in the apical third. In root canals with metal posts, the overall dentin thickness was significantly underestimated in all CBCT images within the cervical and middle thirds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.