ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Motor, affective, cognitive, and perceptual symptom changes over time in individuals with Parkinson's disease who develop freezing of gait.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence for gait analysis: advances, pitfalls, and challenges - a systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- What is new in Freezing of Gait?Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) affects up to 80% of individuals living with advanced Parkinson's disease and approximately 20% in early stages. Associated with motor, affective, cognitive, and sensory difficulties, FOG is challenging to treat due to its unknown etiology. Approaches and findings in research studies predicting FOG remain inconsistent. To help address discrepant methods and results, this prospective, longitudinal study evaluated motor, affective, cognitive, and perceptual predictors of FOG. Data from 120 individuals with idiopathic Parkinson's disease from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative cohort were analyzed across two years to evaluate the strongest FOG predictors. Over this period, 25 individuals developed FOG (transitional freezers), 71 remained non-freezers, and the remaining 24 participants experienced freezing at baseline and follow-up (continuous freezers). Two-way Time*Group ANOVAs and non-parametric equivalents assessed data longitudinally. Separate logistic regression models evaluated FOG predictors one and two years prior to onset. Transitional freezers showed lower baseline immediate verbal recall z-scores than non-freezers. Transitional freezers' dyskinesia severity, postural instability/gait difficulty, and depression increased, and attentional set-shifting and delayed visuospatial memory declined. Motor symptoms and longer disease duration predicted FOG two years prior, with affective and cognitive measures predictive one year prior. Models had high specificity (2 years: 97.0%, 1 year: 90.4%) but not sensitivity (2 years: 43.8%, 1 year: 52.9%), with accuracies of 86.7% and 81.2%, respectively. These findings highlight the change in FOG predictors relative to its onset time, which might explain conflicting findings to date. Future work should consider whether predictors vary by disease stage or FOG 'subtype'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.