ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Gastrocnemius medialis tendon properties do not differ between male academy soccer players and control participants but are related to jump performance.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gastrocnemius medialis muscle architecture and its relationship with countermovement jump performance differ between male academy soccer players and control participants.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate (i) differences in gastrocnemius medialis (GM) tendon properties between adult male soccer players from an English category one academy (ASP) and male control participants (CON); and (ii) the relationships between GM tendon properties and jump performance. The GM tendon force-elongation relationship was measured in 13 ASP (mean ± SD height 1.81 ± 0.07 m; mass 73.6 ± 5.4 kg; age 18.8 ± 1.2 years) and 11 CON (1.74 ± 0.05 m; 71.2 ± 7.6 kg; 22.3 ± 3.0 years) using a combination of dynamometry, ultrasonography and electromyography. Participants also performed a series of unilateral and bilateral countermovement jumps (CMJ) and bilateral drop jumps on a force platform. GM tendon properties did not differ between groups but maximal tendon elongation correlated inversely with unilateral vertical CMJ peak power (r = -0.427, P = 0.037). Furthermore, leg stiffness and peak force during a drop jump correlated with GM tendon stiffness (r = 0.431-0.462, P = 0.035-0.023), maximal tendon force and Achilles tendon CSA (r = 0.409-0.737, P ≤ 0.047). These results suggest that GM tendon properties do not differ between ASP and CON but a stiffer GM tendon may facilitate the production of larger forces to increase power output during a unilateral vertical CMJ. Furthermore, higher force and stiffness outputs are achieved during a drop jump by stronger individuals with larger and stiffer GM tendons, which could lead to greater pitch-based performance and may represent a protective mechanism to shield the tendon against injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.