Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Short-term outcomes for intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer-a prospective cohort study (ICEA-study).
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05039762 (Intracorporeal vs. Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colonic Cancer - A Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intracorporeal vs. Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colonic Cancer - A Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardised Pfannenstiel versus supraumbilical muscle-sparing transverse extraction sites in colon cancer surgery: An IDEAL stage 4 report.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for Colon Cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to compare short-term outcomes and 1-year incisional hernia rates between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for management of right-sided colonic cancer. The primary outcome was the complication rate assessed by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Secondary outcomes included time to bowel movement, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, early warning scores, and 1-year incisional hernia rate.
methodThis was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Patients with right-sided colonic cancer eligible for laparoscopic surgery with primary anastomosis were consecutively included. Patients included in the first period underwent EA, while those in the second underwent IA. Clinical data were collected during the hospital admission up to 30 days postoperatively. Complications were evaluated by the CCI. A routine 1-year CT-scan was used to assess hernias.
resultsOne hundred three patients (51 in the EA and 52 in the IA groups) were included. Demographics were similar between the two groups. No significant difference in the CCI-score was found (EA: 17.9 (23.9) vs. IA: 15.0 (17.4), p = 0.85). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group (EA 6.6 days, IA 3.9 days, p = 0.02). The groups had no significant differences regarding other outcomes, including hernia rates (p = 0.12).
conclusionLaparoscopic right hemicolectomy with IA significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without increasing complication rates compared to EA.
trial registrationThe study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05039762).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.