ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Gender parity in radiation oncology in Germany: a 2024 analysis of professional roles and academic training.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
- Balancing barriers: Family, career, and gender equality in radiation oncology and radiation research-An interdisciplinary prospective survey among the young workforce.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Gender disparities in historical context, workforce structure, and decision-making.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite some progress, gender inequalities remain prevalent in many medical fields, including radiation oncology (RO). This study investigates gender parity in RO in Germany, with a particular focus on the distribution of professional positions and academic qualifications.
methodsUsing data from the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO), we analyzed gender representation in various roles including resident physicians, specialists, senior physicians, leading positions, and heads of university departments. Additionally, academic achievements such as doctoral degrees and professorships were examined. Temporal trends were assessed by comparing data from 2006, while interdisciplinary comparisons were made using current data from other medical specialties.
resultsAn increase in the proportion of female members was found, rising by a factor of 1.85 (2006: 570 vs. 2024: 1055). However, significant gender disparities persist, particularly at higher professional levels. Leadership positions remain male dominated, with women holding only 18.9% of full professorships in 2024. In 2006, just 1 in 9 university chair positions and 1 in 40 professorships were occupied by women. These figures had improved by 2024, with women holding 1 in 5 university chair positions and professorships.
conclusionDespite progress in representation, significant gender disparities remain in leadership and academic positions within RO. Structural barriers continue to impede women's career advancement. This study identifies these obstacles and advocates for targeted initiatives to foster gender equity, including mentorship programs and family-friendly policies. The ultimate goal is to establish an equitable and appealing professional environment for future generations in RO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.