ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Thalidomide-induced limb malformations: an update and reevaluation.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secondary Pharmacology Targets for Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment of New Drugs: Clinical Pharmacology Considerations.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- The Rise of Regulatogens: A Crisis of Insouciance and Dilettantism in the Regulatory DART World-And How We Must Fix It.Birth defects research · 2026Review
- The degradation revolution: harnessing targeted protein degradation for the treatment of human diseases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Context Matters: E3 Ligase-Ligand Pairing Strategies for Optimized PROTAC Performance.Protein & cell · 2025Article
- Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment: Are We Ready for the Next Thalidomide?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Phocomelia: Bilateral limb deficiency in a neonate: A case report.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, thalidomide-induced congenital malformations have served as an important example of the enhanced susceptibility of developing embryos to chemical perturbation. The compound produced a wide variety of congenital malformations in humans, which were initially detected by an association with a relatively rare limb defect labeled phocomelia. Although true phocomelia in the most severe form is a transverse defect with intercalary absence of limb regions, it is proposed that thalidomide produces a longitudinal limb phenotype in humans under usual circumstances that can become transverse in severe cases with a preferential sensitivity of forelimb over hindlimb, preaxial over postaxial, and left more impacted than the corresponding non-autopod limb bones on the right. The thalidomide-induced limb phenotype in humans is described and followed by a hierarchical comparison with various laboratory animal species. Mechanistic studies have been hampered by the fact that only non-human primates and rabbits have malformations that are anatomically similar to humans. Included in this review are unpublished data on limb malformations produced by thalidomide in rhesus monkeys from experiments performed more than 50 years ago. The critical period in gestation for the induction of phocomelia may initiate prior to the development of the embryonic limb bud, which contrasts with other chemical and physical agents that are known to produce this phenotype. The importance of toxicokinetic parameters is reviewed including dose, enantiomers, absorption, distribution, and both non-enzymatic and enzymatic biotransformations. The limb embryopathy mechanism that provides a partial explanation of the limb phenotype is that cereblon binds to thalidomide creating a protein complex that ubiquitinates protein substrates (CRL4
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.