SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Efficacy of cyclophosphamide for skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic connective tissue disorder characterized by skin thickening with vascular and visceral involvements. The efficacy of cyclophosphamide for SSc-related skin fibrosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide for skin fibrosis in SSc.
methodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for all published clinical trials on the treatment of SSc with cyclophosphamide until January 15, 2025.The outcome of interest was the extent of skin fibrosis, measured by the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted with Stata/SE software.
resultsA total of 20 articles involving 869 patients met the inclusion criteria. Cyclophosphamide reduced mRSS score by 2.30 (95% CI 0.72-3.88), 4.53 (95% CI 2.91-6.14), 6.72 (95% CI 2.74-10.70), 5.70 (95% CI 4.04-7.36), and 4.60 (95% CI 3.18-6.02) at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24- and 36-month, respectively. The estimated effect size, obtained by pooling mRSS from all studies at the follow-up endpoint, decreased by 4.71 (95% CI 2.72-6.70). In diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) subtype, the pooled mRSS decreased by 3.02 (95% CI 1.46-4.58), 6.45 (95% CI 5.02-7.87), 8.03 (95% CI 5.26-10.80), and 6.34 (95% CI 6.00-6.68) at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month, respectively. And the overall reduction in mRSS at the end of follow-up in dcSSc was 7.30 (95% CI 5.61-8.99) across 11 studies. Significant heterogeneity was observed among these studies, and subgroup analysis revealed that study size and disease subtype partially explained the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis indicated good study stability.
conclusionCyclophosphamide effectively reduced mRSS scores in SSc, particularly in dcSSc. While skin thickness improvement diminishes after 24 months, it remains a viable option for patients with worsening skin fibrosis.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42024502283. Registered on 25 January 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40198334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.