Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198317›Full record

ArticleLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2025

Relative Exchangeable Copper, Exchangeable Copper and Total Copper in the Diagnosis of Wilson Disease.

Camilla Lorenzen, Karen Dons, Clàudia García-Solà, Xavier Forns, Frederik Teicher Kirk, Emilie Munk Lynderup, Karina Stubkjær Rewitz, Anna Soria, Sergio Rodríguez-Tajes, Lene Damm Christensen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Relative Exchangeable and Exchangeable Copper: Emerging New Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring in Wilson's Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Camilla LorenzenDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-7289-1488
Karen DonsDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clàudia García-SolàLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier FornsLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8188-1764
Frederik Teicher KirkDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3058-9042
Emilie Munk LynderupDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karina Stubkjær RewitzDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anna SoriaLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-8343
Sergio Rodríguez-TajesLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-7557
Lene Damm ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tua GyldenholmDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter Nissen BjerringDepartment of Intestinal Failure and Liver Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna MiralpeixLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè TorraBiochemistry and Molecular Genetics Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Peter OttDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas Damgaard SandahlDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Zoe MariñoLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-9534

Funding

Anna Soria received support by a Río Hortega grant and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Accion Estrategica en Salud (expedient CM23/00133).CERCA Programme/Generalitat de CatalunyaEuropean Union (expedient CM23/00133), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Acción Estratégica en Salud, December 2023 Call (A.S.C)Fabrikant Vilhelm Pedersen og Hustrus LegatSecretaria d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement (Grant 2021_SGR_01322)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDiagnosing Wilson disease (WD) remains challenging. The exchangeable copper (CuEXC) methodology measures the non-ceruloplasmin-bound copper fraction in serum. Relative exchangeable copper (REC), the ratio of CuEXC to total serum copper (Total Cu), has been proposed as a potential diagnostic biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these three copper biomarkers in WD.

methodsCuEXC and Total Cu levels were measured in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with WD (n = 13), treated WD (n = 91), non-Wilsonian hepatic disease (n = 206) and non-Wilsonian acute liver failure (n = 22). REC, CuEXC and Total Cu were compared among groups. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses were performed.

resultsMedian REC was significantly elevated among patients with WD compared to all other groups combined (23.6% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). The opposite was found for Total Cu (3.5 μmol/L vs. 17.2 μmol/L, p < 0.001). In newly diagnosed patients with WD, median REC was significantly higher than in treated patients (29.1% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.008). The optimal diagnostic cut-off value for REC was ≥ 13.8% (sensitivity 100% and specificity 99.6%) for newly diagnosed patients versus those with non-Wilsonian hepatic disease. For Total Cu, the optimal cut-off was ≤ 7.1 μmol/L (sensitivity 61.5% and specificity 99.1%) for newly diagnosed patients with WD versus those with non-Wilsonian hepatic disease.

conclusionOur data support the diagnostic value of REC in WD. The more broadly available Total Cu also demonstrates a strong diagnostic performance and may be useful in initial work-up. We suggest including REC and/or Total Cu in a future revision of the Leipzig score.

Indexed as

CopperHepatolenticular DegenerationAdolescentAdultBiomarkersCeruloplasminChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultBiomarkersCeruloplasminCopperbiomarkerdiagnosisnon‐ceruloplasmin‐bound copperrelative exchangeable coppertotal copperWilson disease

Identifiers

PMID40198317
PMCPMC11977851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.