Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198102›Full record

RevieweLife2025

Connecting the dots: Managing species interaction networks to mitigate the impacts of global change.

Luis Abdala-Roberts, Adriana Puentes, Deborah L Finke, Robert J Marquis, Marta Montserrat, Erik H Poelman, Sergio Rasmann, Arnaud Sentis, Celia C Symons, Nicole M van Dam and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Trait-based approaches to restoration ecology: Synthesizing insights from diverse systems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luis Abdala-Roberts *Departamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biologicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatán, Yucatan, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-3043
Adriana Puentes *Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Deborah L FinkeDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States.
Robert J MarquisDepartment of Biology and the Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Marta MontserratInstituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora" (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientıficas, Málaga, Spain.
Erik H PoelmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Sergio RasmannInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchȃtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-6226
Arnaud SentisUMR RECOVER, INRAE, Aix Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Celia C SymonsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-0327
Nicole M van DamPlant Biotic Interactions, Leibniz Institute for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Grosbeeren, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-5446
Gina WimpDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Christer Björkman *Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kailen A Mooney *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-7794

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-2032435NordForsk The Nordic Center of Excellence CLINF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global change is causing unprecedented degradation of the Earth's biological systems and thus undermining human prosperity. Past practices have focused either on monitoring biodiversity decline or mitigating ecosystem services degradation. Missing, but critically needed, are management approaches that monitor and restore species interaction networks, thus bridging existing practices. Our overall aim here is to lay the foundations of a framework for developing network management, defined here as the study, monitoring, and management of species interaction networks. We review theory and empirical evidence demonstrating the importance of species interaction networks for the provisioning of ecosystem services, how human impacts on those networks lead to network rewiring that underlies ecosystem service degradation, and then turn to case studies showing how network management has effectively mitigated such effects or aided in network restoration. We also examine how emerging technologies for data acquisition and analysis are providing new opportunities for monitoring species interactions and discuss the opportunities and challenges of developing effective network management. In summary, we propose that network management provides key mechanistic knowledge on ecosystem degradation that links species- to ecosystem-level responses to global change, and that emerging technological tools offer the opportunity to accelerate its widespread adoption.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansbiodiversityconservationecologyecosystem servicefood websglobal changespecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID40198102
PMCPMC11978301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.