ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025
Cost-Effectiveness of One-time Universal Testing for Hepatitis D Among Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B in the United States.
Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geospatial Discrepancy of Chronic Hepatitis B and Hepatitis D Testing in Alberta: A Population-Based Spatial Analysis.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2026Article
- Hepatitis A to E in People with HIV: A Virus-Specific Review of Prevention and Treatment.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Impact of Double Reflex Testing and Linkage to Treatment on Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection in the United States.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection increases the risk of liver-related deaths in adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In the United States (US), only an estimated 12.9% of adults with CHB have received an HDV antibody test. The aim of this study is to calculate the cost-effectiveness of one-time universal HDV testing of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive adults living in the US.
methodsA Markov model was used to calculate the costs, health impact, and cost-effectiveness of universal testing of HBsAg-positive adults with an HDV antibody test and, when positive, an HDV RNA test for chronic HDV infection. We assumed that 50% of the HDV RNA-positive patients would receive the current recommended treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for 48 weeks with a 30% response rate. We also modeled the potential impact of hypothetical indefinite HDV antiviral therapy with a higher response rate to assess the annual cost threshold to be considered cost-effective.
resultsUniversal HDV testing of adults with CHB could avert 100 HDV-related deaths and an additional 30 cases of cirrhosis and 50 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, and potentially result in a gain of 1500 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per 100 000 HBsAg-positive individuals screened. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, the annual drug costs for a hypothetical indefinite therapy with a 50% or 70% treatment response rate would need to cost ≤$13 027 and ≤$14 104, respectively.
conclusionsOne-time HDV testing for all HBsAg-positive adults and treatment of chronic HDV infection with PEG-IFN is potentially cost-effective in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.