Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198081›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2025

Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Carrie D Patnode, Caitlyn A Senger, Erin L Coppola, Megan O Iacocca

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions to support breastfeeding among mothers living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carrie D PatnodeKaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Caitlyn A SengerKaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Erin L CoppolaKaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Megan O IacoccaKaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Interventions to support breastfeeding may help individuals and families initiate breastfeeding or breastfeed exclusively or for a prolonged period of time. Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2016 recommendation. Data Sources: Studies included in the previous review were reevaluated for inclusion and updated searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through June 3, 2024. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications through January 24, 2025. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that evaluated a primary care-relevant intervention designed to support breastfeeding. Of 290 full-text articles reviewed, 90 met inclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another. Main Outcomes and Measures: Child and maternal health outcomes, prevalence, and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions. Results: Ninety trials (N = 49 597) reported in 125 publications were included. The evidence represented individuals from diverse backgrounds and interventions that varied in timing, delivery, and duration. There was limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions on infant health outcomes (10 trials [n = 6592]) and maternal symptoms of anxiety, depression, and well-being (9 trials [n = 2334]). Pooled analyses indicated beneficial associations between breastfeeding support interventions and any or exclusive breastfeeding for up to and at 6 months (any breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; 37 trials [n = 13 579] and exclusive breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78]; 37 trials [n = 14 398]). There was no relationship between interventions and breastfeeding initiation or breastfeeding at 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance: The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions can increase the prevalence of any or exclusive breastfeeding up to and at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on how to best provide this support consistently for all individuals making feeding decisions for their infants.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesBreast FeedingHealth PromotionPreventive Health ServicesSocial SupportAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychological Well-BeingRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40198081
PMCPMC13521260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.