Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40198071›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Geographic Disparities in Oral Cancer Survival From 10 Population-Based Cancer Registries in India.

Krishnan Sathishkumar, Jayasankar Sankarapillai, Stephen Santhappan, Aleyamma Mathew, Rekha A Nair, Nitin Gangane, Sushma Khuraijam, Debanjana Barman, Shashank Pandya, Gautam Majumdar and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Krishnan SathishkumarNational Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India.
Jayasankar SankarapillaiNational Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India.
Stephen SanthappanNational Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India.
Aleyamma MathewRegional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Rekha A NairRegional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Nitin GanganeMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, India.
Sushma KhuraijamRegional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, India.
Debanjana BarmanDr B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India.
Shashank PandyaThe Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.
Gautam MajumdarRegional Cancer Centre, Agartala, India.
Vinay DeshmaneIndian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India.
Eric ZomawiaNational Health Mission, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, Aizawl, India.
Ashok T SherpaNew STNM (Sir Thutob Namgyal Memorial) Hospital, Gangtok, India.
Preethi GeorgeRegional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Swapna MaliyeMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, India.
Tashnin RahmanDr B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India.
Anand ShahThe Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.
Shravani KoyandeIndian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India.
Lalawmpuii PachuauNational Health Mission, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, Aizawl, India.
Priya D PradhanNew STNM (Sir Thutob Namgyal Memorial) Hospital, Gangtok, India.
Shalin Lily GiboyNational Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India.
Prashant MathurNational Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: India accounts for more than one-third of oral cancer (OC) cases globally. Cancer survival measures the effectiveness of the health care system's cancer control efforts and the proportion of people who survive during a specified time. Objective: To estimate the 5-year survival rates among patients with OC diagnosed in India and assess the association of survival with age, place of residence, histologic type, and clinical extent of OC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study evaluated survival of patients diagnosed with primary OC (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Revision, codes C01-C06) between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, and followed up until June 30, 2021. Patients were included from 10 population-based cancer registries (PBCRs). Data were analyzed between March 15 and August 20, 2024. Exposures: Demographic factors (patient age, sex, and place of residence) and disease factors (clinical extent of disease and histologic type). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 5-year age-standardized relative survival (ASRS) for OC among male and female patients. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI, adjusting for covariates. Results: Data from the 10 PBCRs encompassed 14 059 patients of all ages (median age, 55 [IQR, 45-65] years; 10 380 male [73.8%]) diagnosed with OC. The overall 5-year ASRS rate for OC was 37.2% (range, 20.9%-58.4%). The estimated ASRS rates at 5 years were 36.0% (range, 20.7%-59.3%) for male and 39.6% (range, 21.4%-54.8%) for female patients. Ahmedabad urban had the highest 5-year ASRS at 58.4% (95% CI, 56.3%-60.4%) for both sexes, while Manipur had the lowest rates at 20.9% (95% CI, 14.9%-27.6%). Survival rates differed significantly between rural areas (34.1%; 95% CI, 31.4%-36.9%) and urban areas (48.5%; 95% CI, 47.4%-49.7%). Pooled data from Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram revealed that individuals 65 years or older (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.44-2.14) and those with distant metastasis (HR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.78-5.60) had a significantly higher risk of death. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study from India, significant survival disparities were observed among patients with OC based on demographic factors and clinical characteristics. Survival rates were lower in rural areas compared with urban regions, underscoring the inequalities in quality of care and services and emphasizing the need to improve OC survival rates in India.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMouth NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID40198071
PMCPMC11979727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.