Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197958›Full record

ArticleCoDAS2025

FonoTCS: validation of a tool for assessing clinical reasoning in Speech-Language pathology.

Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama, Roberto da Costa Quinino, Adriane Mesquita Medeiros, Patrícia Cotta Mancini, Aline Mansueto Mourão, Lara Gama Santos, Thais Helena Machado, Nayara Ribeiro Gomes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Cristina Côrtes GamaDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-5328
Roberto da Costa QuininoDepartamento de Estatística, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-1331
Adriane Mesquita MedeirosDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2817-2555
Patrícia Cotta ManciniDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-1413
Aline Mansueto MourãoDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-6758
Lara Gama SantosCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9429-7019
Thais Helena MachadoDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-200X
Nayara Ribeiro GomesPrograma de Pós-graduação (doutorado) em Ciências Fonoaudiológicas, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-252X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate the internal structure of the Speech-Language Pathology Script Concordance Test (FonoTCS), which will be developed in a virtual, open-access format, to be used in the assessment of clinical reasoning among young professionals and students of speech-language pathology with a generalist background, speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.

methodsThis is a study to validate the internal structure of the instrument. Twenty-five specialist speech-language pathologists, with more than 10 years of generalist clinical experience, and 35 students summoned for Enade participated. Both groups evaluated the 30 clinical cases with 120 items from FonoTCS. For the final selection of specialists who made up the sample, judges whose evaluations showed Z2 results >2 and Z<-2 distant from the modal response were removed. For the selection of items present in the final format of the test, those that remained had a Pearson correlation between the transformed scores of students for a given item and the sum of the transformed scores for all items, with a value greater than 0.05. The Cronbach's Alpha test was applied to measure the internal consistency of FonoTCS, and the score of each item was defined based on the aggregated score method.

resultsThe responses of 13 specialists were considered for the definition of the final test score. The final instrument had 88 items distributed across 28 clinical cases. The internal consistency was 0.903 with a 95% confidence interval expressed by 0.86|---|0.95. These values indicate a high internal consistency among the items of FonoTCS.

conclusionFonoTCS is valid and reliable for use in evaluating the clinical reasoning of young professionals and speech-language pathology students with generalist training, who are Brazilian Portuguese speakers.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceClinical ReasoningEducational MeasurementSpeech-Language PathologyAdultBrazilFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40197958
PMCPMC11991717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.