Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197956›Full record

Observational studyCoDAS2025

Characterization of swallowing in older adults with dementia.

Bruna de Sousa Santos, Juliana Onofre de Lira, Laura Davison Mangilli

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruna de Sousa SantosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - UnB, Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-9615
Juliana Onofre de LiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - UnB, Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-4781
Laura Davison MangilliPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Universidade de Brasília - UnB, Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2739-126X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze swallowing in older adults with dementia through clinical evaluation at a referral center for elderly healthcare.

methodsRetrospective, cross-sectional, observational study with older people, stratified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Characterization was based on data extracted from medical records, including functional, cognitive, and mood assessments. The clinical evaluation of swallowing consisted of food offered in three consistencies, analyzing 13 items and functional classification.

resultsThe sample included 149 older adults - 47 neurotypical (CDR 0), 37 with mild dementia (CDR 1), 40 with moderate dementia (CDR 2), and 25 with severe dementia (CDR 3). The groups differed significantly, indicating greater changes in swallowing according to the severity of dementia. For instance, CDR 3 had greater changes in oral spillage of liquids than CDR 0 (p=0.012*). Cough with solids and drop in oxygen saturation with liquids were greater in CDR 3 than in CDR 1 (p=0.039* and p=0.047*, respectively). CDR 3 also had a higher frequency of reduced laryngeal excursion with nectar than CDR 2 (p=0.044*). Only positive cervical auscultation with nectar showed greater change in CDR 2 than in CDR 1 (p=0.019*). Oral residue of solids had a greater change in CDR 1 than in CDR 0 (p=0.030*).

conclusionThe severity of dementia was associated with swallowing impairments, highlighting the need for specific interventions in this population.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID40197956
PMCPMC11991718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.