ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Probability of referral to curative dental treatment in a preventive pediatric dentistry program.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventive maintenance in pediatric dentistry is essential for monitoring oral health and promoting healthy habits. This study aimed to evaluate how the frequency of follow-up appointments, as well as sex- and age-related differences, impact the probability of referral for curative treatment among pediatric dentistry patients at a Brazilian dental school. This retrospective longitudinal study included dental records of patients who had their first appointment between the second half of 2013 and the second half of 2019, completed treatment, and returned for at least one check-up visit. Descriptive and survival analyses were performed. A total of 296 dental records were evaluated, comprising 47.6% female and 52.4% male patients. The likelihood of referral to curative treatment increased with longer follow-up intervals, reaching 18.9% at six months and 82.7% at 48 months. Patients aged 9 years or younger were 2.07 times more likely to be referred to curative treatment than those aged 10 years or older. No significant difference was observed in referral probability between boys and girls. Longer intervals between check-up visits increased the likelihood of referral to curative treatment, which was higher among older children. Establishing personalized follow-up intervals based on individual patient needs is crucial for maintaining oral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.