ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Exploring masticatory performance: a bibliometric analysis of studies published in the Web of Science database from 1950 to 2024.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Periodontal and microbiological evaluation in cleft lip/palate patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectively evaluating an individual's capacity for food fragmentation (masticatory performance) is crucial for understanding oral physiology and dental rehabilitation processes. Our aim was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature focusing on masticatory performance. We conducted a survey in Web of Science up to August 31, 2024, applying specific category filters. Two calibrated reviewers manually tabulated the data, extracting information on title, authorship, keywords, institutions, countries, number of citations, year of publication, journal title, study design, masticatory test, population, and dentition status. VosViewer software generated collaborative network maps, while JAMOVI was used to perform ANOVA and Poisson regression analyses. The selection process resulted in 814 articles published between 1950 and 2024, with a recent increase to at least 50 articles per year. The average impact factor was 3.16, with around 30 citations per article. Citations were significantly influenced by the masticatory performance technique, publication year, and journal impact factor. The comminution test was the most prevalent (n = 411). Most studies focused on adults (n = 420) and older adults (n = 361), in which natural dentition (n = 404) and complete dentures (n = 214) were the most widely assessed parameters. The most frequent study designs were cross-sectional (n=489) and prospective (n = 145). The leading countries were Japan (n=202), Brazil (n=134), and the Netherlands (n = 69), and the Journal of Oral Rehabilitation was the most recurrent journal (n = 162). This study highlights the growing interest in evaluating masticatory performance, with a significant increase in publications over the years. This study highlights the need for further research involving children and longitudinal study designs, as well as studies evaluating rehabilitations with removable partial denture and implant-supported prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.