ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Brazilian red propolis as a potential antimicrobial additive in orthodontic primers.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial efficacy of light-cured glass ionomer cements incorporating red propolis extract.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of adding ethanolic extract of red propolis (EERP) on antimicrobial activity, polymerization kinetics (PK), degree of conversion (DC), and shear bond strength (SBS) of the orthodontic adhesive system. Transbond XT Primer was the control group (G1). The experimental adhesives contained 3.25 mg/mL (G2) and 6.50 mg/mL (G3) EERP. Minimum inhibitory concentration and biofilm assay against Streptococcus mutans, and bacterial and exopolysaccharide (EPS) evaluation by confocal laser scanning microscope were performed. PK and DC were evaluated by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. The bracket-tooth SBS was evaluated by a universal testing machine. Both antimicrobial and SBS results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p<0.05). PK and DC data were submitted to ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. G3 presented better antimicrobial activity, inhibiting more than 95% of planktonic S. Mutans, 25% of biofilm dry-weight, and 50% of EPS production (p<0.05). PK was different among the groups. DC after 40 seconds of photoactivation ranged from 68.62% for G1 to 76.85% for G2 (p<0.05). SBS data was not presented as statistically significant (p>0.05). Transbond XT Primer modified with 6.5 mg/mL EERP demonstrated antimicrobial activity with no reduction of the bracket-tooth SBS. Propolis-modification did not influence the physic-chemical properties of the orthodontic adhesive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.