Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197874›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Accuracy of parasitological techniques and positivity for endoparasites in stray and household cats in Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.

Isa Marianny Ferreira Nascimento Barbosa de Souza, Stéfanne Rodrigues Rezende Ferreira, Samuel Felipe Netzlaff, Amanda Cristina Corrêa Fleury, Victor da Silva Siqueira, Gabriella Katrinny Avelar Oliveira, Isabella da Costa Ribeiro, Júlia Batista Dornelas, Ludimila Paula Vaz Cardoso, Hanstter Hallison Alves Rezende

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isa Marianny Ferreira Nascimento Barbosa de SouzaLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Stéfanne Rodrigues Rezende FerreiraLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0380-0428
Samuel Felipe NetzlaffLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Amanda Cristina Corrêa FleuryLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Victor da Silva SiqueiraLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Gabriella Katrinny Avelar OliveiraLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Isabella da Costa RibeiroLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Júlia Batista DornelasLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Ludimila Paula Vaz CardosoLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.
Hanstter Hallison Alves RezendeLaboratório de Bacteriologia e Micologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Jataí - UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the positivity of intestinal parasitosis in cats from the city of Jataí, Goiás, as well as to determine the accuracy of different parasitological techniques applied. 120 samples were collected, 64 from household cats and 56 from stray. The parasitological techniques of Willis, Sheather, Faust, Hoffman-Pons-Janer-Lutz and Rugai staining were then performed. The positivity rate of endoparasites in the analyzed samples was 19.2%, with a predominance of hookworm eggs. Cystoisospora spp. and Hammondia hammondi oocysts were also found, with a case of co-infection with the two species. No statistical difference in positivity was found between household and stray cats. However, a significant difference was found upon evaluating sex and neutering status, revealing that male cats and non-neutered animals showed higher positivity rates, with 28.8% of non-neutered animals testing positive compared to 9.83% of neutered animals. The Willis technique was considered the gold standard for hookworm diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 91.3%. While the Willis technique was identified as the gold standard for detecting hookworm eggs, the evaluation of other methodologies demonstrated that the integration of techniques can improve the detection of various parasitic stages.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticAnimalsBrazilCatsFemaleMaleParasitology

Identifiers

PMID40197874
PMCPMC11991666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.