ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025
Accuracy of parasitological techniques and positivity for endoparasites in stray and household cats in Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.
Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the positivity of intestinal parasitosis in cats from the city of Jataí, Goiás, as well as to determine the accuracy of different parasitological techniques applied. 120 samples were collected, 64 from household cats and 56 from stray. The parasitological techniques of Willis, Sheather, Faust, Hoffman-Pons-Janer-Lutz and Rugai staining were then performed. The positivity rate of endoparasites in the analyzed samples was 19.2%, with a predominance of hookworm eggs. Cystoisospora spp. and Hammondia hammondi oocysts were also found, with a case of co-infection with the two species. No statistical difference in positivity was found between household and stray cats. However, a significant difference was found upon evaluating sex and neutering status, revealing that male cats and non-neutered animals showed higher positivity rates, with 28.8% of non-neutered animals testing positive compared to 9.83% of neutered animals. The Willis technique was considered the gold standard for hookworm diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 91.3%. While the Willis technique was identified as the gold standard for detecting hookworm eggs, the evaluation of other methodologies demonstrated that the integration of techniques can improve the detection of various parasitic stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.