ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective log-based quality assurance of real-time MLC adaptation on a helical tomotherapy platform.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- An Analysis of Quality Assurance for Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans Using Two Dosimetric Methods: The arcCHECK System and EPIbeam Based Dosimetric Approach.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs medical linear accelerator technology advances, enabling higher dose rate deliveries, hypofractionation regimens has increased. This necessitates respiratory gating systems that synchronize radiation delivery with tumor position, requiring simple rigorous quality assurance (QA) to ensure treatment accuracy and patient safety. PURPOSE: This study aimed to propose log-based QA for respiratory-gated radiation therapy using the respiratory gating system and treatment machine.
methods4D CT scans were performed with a Varian motion phantom using a Varian Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC). A treatment plan using 25%-75% respiratory phases with 100 MU was created and delivered to a solid water phantom. Treatment logs containing respiratory signals, beam on/off flags, and frame information were extracted from the treatment planning system's offline review. Log file analyses were conducted using in-house softwares to assess temporal synchronization between respiratory phases and beam triggers. Output measurements using a calibrated ion chamber (FC65G) were performed to evaluate dosimetric accuracy. Additionally, EPID images were acquired in cine mode and analyzed frame-by-frame to independently verify beam delivery timing.
resultsLog file analysis revealed precise temporal synchronization, with mean time differences of 0.03 s ± 0.05 s between the planned 25% phase and beam-on, and -0.04 s ± 0.05 s between 75% phase and beam-off. The log-derived beam-on duration (2.61 s ± 0.02 s) closely matched the planned duration (2.66 s ± 0.00 s). Three-month log data showed consistent temporal accuracy, with trigger-on times remaining stable at 2.60 s ± 0.01 s across all measurements. Supporting ion chamber measurements confirmed dosimetric agreement between gating and non-gating modes (difference: 0.05 cGy ± 0.09 cGy)
conclusionsThe proposed log file-based QA method demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility in assessing respiratory gating performance. This approach provides an efficient, objective method for standardizing QA procedures in respiratory-gated radiation therapy, enhancing treatment accuracy and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.