ArticleInsect science2025
The effects of loose, firm, fine, and coarse substrates on the movement of the red flour beetle.
Article in Insect science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obstacles Influence Red Flour Beetle (Tribolium castaneum) Movement More Than Path Length or Turns.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Movement plays a crucial role in animal behavior. However, despite the prevalence of uneven terrains in nature, many movement studies are conducted in arenas with smooth substrates. This discrepancy raises questions about the ecological validity of such experiments. To address this gap, we investigated the effect of rough substrates on movement properties using the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) as a model organism. Our findings revealed significant variations in movement behavior between rough and smooth substrates. Notably, beetles traveled longer distances on smooth surfaces compared to sandpaper and loose sand. Moreover, variations in step size were influenced by substrate treatment, with the highest values observed on sand and sandpaper treatments. The proportion of time spent standing still also showed sensitivity to substrate conditions. The interaction between substrate properties and beetle sex further influenced several movement properties. Even the spatial configuration of rough and smooth areas in the arena had an impact on beetle movement, with areas along the arena perimeter exhibiting a stronger effect. These results highlight the impact of uneven terrain on beetle movement, underscoring the importance of considering environmental conditions when designing experimental setups. Here, this refers to the substrate on which animals move, but it may refer to other conditions, such as the test arena size and shape, temperature, humidity, and illumination. Failure to account for these background environmental conditions may result in inadvertently examining the interaction of the tested animals with these conditions, rather than focusing on the effect of the treatments applied in the experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.