Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197554›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Solutions for Kids in Pain: Embedding and actioning patient partnership in a national knowledge mobilization network.

Dawn P Richards, Christine T Chambers, Isabel Jordan, Kimberly Strain, Raad Fadaak, Louise Tunnah, Emily Gruenwoldt, Kathryn A Birnie

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dawn P RichardsPatient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada. dawn.p.richards@gmail.com.
Christine T ChambersDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. christine.chambers@dal.ca.
Isabel JordanSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kimberly StrainSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Raad FadaakSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Louise TunnahSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Emily GruenwoldtSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kathryn A BirnieSolutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement is now often expected or required by funders for research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a national knowledge mobilization network in Canada that is on a mission to mobilize evidence-based solutions in children's pain through coordination and collaboration. SKIP began as a Networks of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network from 2019 to 2024 and continues as a university-based centre. SKIP was built on a foundation of engaging with patients (children and youth) and caregivers (parents) primarily guided by the Patients Included™ charter. MAIN BODY: This paper shares SKIP's leading approach to patient partnership during its time as a NCE-KM network. As required by its NCE funding, SKIP was hosted by an academic institution (Dalhousie University) and co-led by a knowledge user partner (Children's Healthcare Canada), with six hubs across Canada. Here, we demonstrate how SKIP integrated patient partners through its governance, management, committees, and KM activities. We also discuss patient partnership resources developed by SKIP to support its implementation of quality patient partnership practices. Three case examples show in detail how SKIP tailored and evolved its patient partnership approach to specific projects and context. These examples include SKIP's Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, a national Youth in Pain project, and integrating patient partners in the co-development of Canada's first national health standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Each case demonstrates foundational principles to SKIP's patient partnership including providing compensation and efforts to create safe and inclusive spaces.

conclusionSKIP's commitment to patient partnership is actioned through integrating patient partners throughout all aspects of its work. We share insights gained from SKIP's patient partnership activities during its time as an NCE-KM network, including developed resources and practices. We encourage others to adopt and adapt our learnings and resources for their own work. As SKIP's NCE-KM funding and structure ends and the organization continues as a university-based centre, SKIP remains committed to developing and sharing leading patient partnership practices.

Indexed as

Knowledge mobilizationKnowledge translationPatient and family partnerPatient and public involvementPatient engagementPatient partnershipPatient research partnerYouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID40197554
PMCPMC11977981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.