Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197496›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Methods for community-engaged data collection and analysis in implementation research.

Lawrence A Palinkas, Benjamin Springgate, Leopoldo J Cabassa, Michelle Shin, Samantha Garcia, Benjamin F Crabtree, Jennifer Tsui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Qualitative Mediation Analysis: an Important Method for Exploring Mediating Mechanisms in Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lawrence A PalinkasHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 920932, USA.
Benjamin SpringgateDepartment of Medicine, LSU School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Leopoldo J CabassaBrown School of Social Work, Washington University of St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Michelle ShinDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Samantha GarciaDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benjamin F CrabtreeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jennifer TsuiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. tsuijenn@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-9636

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Ethnic Diversity and Cancer DisparitiesT32CA229110 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HAIMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALAN, LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5R37CA242541NCI NIH HHS 5T32CA229110NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity engagement is widely recognized as critical to successful and equitable implementation of evidence-based practices, programs, and policies. However, there are no clear guidelines for community involvement in data collection and analysis in implementation research.

methodsWe describe three specific methods for engaging community members in data collection and analysis: concept mapping, rapid ethnographic assessment, and Photovoice. Common elements are identified from a case study of each method: 1) selection and adaptation of evidence-based strategies for improving adolescent HPV vaccine initiation rates in disadvantaged communities, 2) strategies for implementing medication for opioid use disorders among low-income Medicaid enrollees during natural disasters, and 3) interventions to improve the physical health of adults with severe mental illness living in supportive housing.

resultsIn all three cases, community members assisted in participant recruitment, provided data, and validated preliminary findings created by researchers. In the Photovoice case study, community members participated in both data collection and analysis, while in the concept mapping, community members also participated in the initial phase of organizing and prioritizing evidence-based strategies during the data analysis.

conclusionsCommunity involvement in implementation research data collection and analysis contributes to greater engagement and empowerment of community members and validation of study findings. Use of methods that exhibit both scientific rigor and community relevance of implementation research also contributes to greater community investment in successful implementation outcomes. Nevertheless, the case studies point to the importance and efficiency of the division of labor embedded in community-engaged implementation research. Building capacity for community members to assume greater roles in obtaining and organizing data for preliminary analysis prior to interpretation is recommended.

Indexed as

Community engaged researchConcept mappingData analysisData collectionPhotovoiceRapid ethnographic assessments

Identifiers

PMID40197496
PMCPMC11978136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.