Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197492›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to advance context-specific and generalizable knowledge of implementation determinants: case study of a digital contingency management platform.

Andrea Jakubowski, Briana Patrick, Kira DiClemente-Bosco, Sarah Salino, Kelli Scott, Sara Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea JakubowskiDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. ajakubow@montefiore.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-5589
Briana PatrickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Rd., Suite 375, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Kira DiClemente-BoscoCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Sarah SalinoCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Kelli ScottCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Sara BeckerCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Funding

Transforming health equity rhetoric to rigor: Development and validation of a novel measure assessing health equity in implementation of health interventionsP50DA054072 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark P McGovern · 2022 to 2026
$18.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054072NIDA NIH HHS P50DA054072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContingency management (CM) is the most effective treatment for stimulant use disorder but is underutilized by opioid treatment programs (OTPs) despite the high prevalence of stimulant use in this setting. As part of a state-wide initiative, we piloted a novel assessment, the Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS), to examine determinants of implementation of a digital CM platform across a set of OTPs. We describe how the IFASIS was used to elucidate both generalizable and context-specific implementation determinants, and to guide the provision of implementation facilitation.

methodsSix OTPs received a multi-level implementation strategy (including facilitation) to promote programmatic uptake of a digital CM platform. Pre-implementation, OTPs completed the IFASIS, a 27-item questionnaire that assesses both the valence (positive/negative) and importance of determinants across 4 domains: outside the organization, within the organization, about the intervention, and about intervention recipients. OTP staff completed the IFASIS as a team, identifying consensus ratings during recorded discussions. Transcripts of IFASIS recordings were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Quantitative IFASIS results were aggregated into medians and ranges within and across organizations. A detailed review of implementation facilitation meeting notes was conducted to examine how the IFASIS was used to guide facilitation.

resultsQuantitative ratings and qualitative feedback revealed common barriers to implementation of the digital CM platform, including a lack of sustainable funding sources, absence of external and organizational policies, insufficient higher-level leadership support, and mixed attitudes among staff members toward CM. Common implementation facilitators included enthusiasm and commitment among organization leadership and the perception that the digital CM platform would reduce the workload and burden on OTP counselors. The IFASIS was used to guide facilitation in several ways, including stimulating discussion about barriers and facilitators, brainstorming strategies to address barriers rated as "very important", and identifying facilitators that could be harnessed as part of implementation efforts.

conclusionsThe IFASIS identified important determinants of CM implementation in OTPs and was instrumental in shaping facilitation. The IFASIS may be a valuable assessment for the implementation science community to identify and address generalizable and context-specific implementation determinants.

Indexed as

Contingency managementImplementation determinantsOpioid treatment programsOpioid use disorderRapid qualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID40197492
PMCPMC11974088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.