Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197490›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Concrete silo collapse: emergency medical services response to a mass casualty incident.

Peter Martin Hansen, Marius Rehn, Rasmus Peter Jakobsen, Jesper Byrdorf, Simon Hestbech Lundorff, Søren Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-border collaboration in a major incident: emergency medical services response to a train crash.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. European perspectives on pre-hospital interagency collaboration during terrorist incidents: a focus group study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter Martin HansenPrehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Kildemosevej 15, Odense C, 5000, Denmark. peter.martin.hansen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-5765
Marius RehnPrehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Kildemosevej 15, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.
Rasmus Peter JakobsenMobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, J B Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-2236
Jesper ByrdorfDanish Air Ambulance, Brendstrupgaardsvej 82, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Simon Hestbech LundorffMobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sygehus Lillebaelt Kolding, Sygehusvej 24, Kolding, 6000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8549-4040
Søren MikkelsenPrehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Kildemosevej 15, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor incidents evolving from occupational accidents are very infrequent in Scandinavia and therefore, case reports are called for. On 26 November, 2024, a fatal occupational accident took place during the construction of a concrete silo in the small rural town of Flemløse (population 574), Denmark. Three people died and six were injured as the result of a collapsing concrete roof during construction. We aim to describe the incident response by the emergency medical services (EMS), to identify areas of improvement, and to evaluate the adherence to current national major incident guidelines and communication grids. CASE PRESENTATION: The initial call to the emergency medical dispatch center described an accident comprising fifteen injured persons, all of whom were migrant workers. Seventeen EMS units including two helicopter EMS units were dispatched to scene. Three critically injured patients were admitted to a nearby trauma center, whereas three lightly injured were taken to a regional trauma hospital. The initial reports overestimated the number of possible casualties and therefore, the available resources were ample. The very construction of the silo resulted in challenging conditions for evacuation of the injured patients. Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) aspects of the incident added to the inherent complexity in major incident management. Although potentially detrimental to the patients, the prolonged extrication of the patients enabled the prehospital services to procure a timely organization of the incident site according to guidelines and an organized transport prioritization of the victims. The communication within EMS and between authorities was generally as per national guideline.

conclusionsThe EMS response to this major incident generally adhered to the national guidelines and, furthermore, the communication within and between authorities was established according to guidelines. Important findings included the use of local resources by the incident command and improvised means for the evacuation of victims from a highly hostile environment. The triage of patients adhered to local and national major incident guidelines. Migrant workers have increased risk for occupational accidents.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalConstruction MaterialsDisaster PlanningEmergency Medical ServicesMass Casualty IncidentsAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTriageEmergency medical servicesHazardous substancesInter-authority cooperationMajor incidentPreparednessTriage systems

Identifiers

PMID40197490
PMCPMC11977906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.