ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2026
Outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using tail-anchor mesh fixation method: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has become increasingly popular, but recurrence remains a concern. This study introduces a novel tail-anchor mesh (TAM) fixation method for LIHR and evaluates the safety, feasibility and clinical outcomes of this technique in patients undergoing LIHR. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween June 2018 and June 2020, 412 patients with inguinal hernias were included in the study. LIHR with the TAM method was performed in 210 patients (Group A), whereas 202 patients underwent LIHR with conventional mesh fixation (Group B). Statistical analysis was used to compare clinical data between the two groups.
resultsThe recurrence rate and incidence of seroma were significantly lower in Group A (0.48% and 1.90%, respectively) than in Group B (3.96% and 9.41%, respectively) ( P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic indicators, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospital stay or patient costs (all P > 0.05). Follow-ups at 24 and 53 months after discharge revealed no cases of wound infection, chronic pain or testicular atrophy in either group.
conclusionsThe TAM fixation method is a safe, feasible and reproducible technique for LIHR and offers superior outcomes compared with conventional mesh fixation, particularly in reducing recurrence and seroma formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.