Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197394›Full record

SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2025

The effect of scopolamine on memory and attention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cerena Miravalles, Dara M Cannon, Brian Hallahan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. European Psychiatry: 2025 in review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Therapeutic relevance of an EU-GMP certifiedFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Scopolamine induced learning deficit in marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Chronic Administration ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cerena MiravallesClinical Research Facility, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-7307
Dara M CannonClinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics, Galway Neuroscience Centre, College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7378-3411
Brian HallahanClinical Research Facility, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-9757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScopolamine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist and is widely utilized as a "memory-loss model." However, its impact across different memory and attention tasks and using different modes of administration has yet to be clearly evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effect of scopolamine, across all routes of administration and across different dosages, on memory and attention performance in healthy humans (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024531634).

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched (on 20 April 2024) for studies that utilized scopolamine and assessed memory and/or attention. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted across a range of memory and attention tasks using "Comprehensive Meta-Analysis," Version 3, to evaluate differential pharmacological effects on cognitive tasks between the scopolamine and placebo groups.

resultsForty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Scopolamine negatively impaired performance on all memory tasks (immediate memory, delayed recall, digit span, Buschke selective reminding task, and recognition memory) and led to slower reaction times for three of the five attention tasks examined (choice reaction time, simple reaction time, and rapid visual information processing) compared to placebo. Scopolamine's negative effect on memory and attention was greater with injectable (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous, and subcutaneous) compared to non-injectable routes of administration (e.g., intranasal, oral, and transdermal).

conclusionThis study supports the use of scopolamine as a "memory-loss model," particularly when given by an injectable route of administration. Future clinical trials should evaluate the bioavailability of scopolamine across different routes of administration to ensure therapeutic benefits outweigh any potential adverse cognitive effects.

Indexed as

AttentionMemoryMuscarinic AntagonistsScopolamineHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsScopolamineattentioncholinergic systemcognitionmemoryscopolamine

Identifiers

PMID40197394
PMCPMC12041729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.