ArticleTrials2025
Safety and efficacy of different rotational speed during rotational atherectomy in coronary heart disease patients (RACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe increasing incidence of coronary heart disease, driven by socio-economic development and population aging, poses significant challenges. Coronary calcification, a major factor complicating percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), often necessitates rotational atherectomy (RA) for lesion preparation. However, the impact of different RA rotational speeds on procedural and clinical outcomes remains unclear. While low-speed RA (LSRA) has been suggested to reduce intraoperative slow flow, evidence is inconsistent, and the benefits of combining LSRA with high-speed RA (HSRA) are not well established. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different rotational speed protocols to guide clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial will target patients with severe coronary artery calcification scheduled for RA. An estimated 210 patients will be enrolled based on sample size calculation, randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to different rotational speed protocols using a random number table. These will include a continuous low-speed rotation (LSRA) group (140,000 rpm), a continuous high-speed rotation (HSRA) group (180,000 rpm), and a high-speed to low-speed rotation (HSRA + LSRA) group (initially 180,000 rpm, followed by 100,000 rpm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of complications during RA, including coronary artery spasm, slow/no reflow, dissection, burr entrapment, guidewire fracture, and perforation. Secondary outcomes encompass intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) assessments (detecting calcific ring disruption and measuring the target lesion's minimum lumen area (MLA) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD)); in-hospital cardiac death, acute stent thrombosis, and heart failure occurrences; and the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). DISCUSSION: The RACE study evaluates the impact of different rotational speeds in coronary rotational atherectomy, aiming to provide guidance for clinical practice. The findings may help standardize RA procedures and inform future clinical guidelines, improving procedural consistency and patient outcomes. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300076194. Registered on September 27, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.