Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197348›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Comparative efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hengyu Tian, Chidan Wan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hengyu TianDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, No, China.
Chidan WanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, No, China. wanchidan@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and advanced-stage disease presents significant therapeutic challenges. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TACE + TKIs + ICIs compared to TKIs + ICIs alone in patients with HCC.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across "PubMed", "Web of Science", "Cochrane Library", "Scopus", "Google Scholar", and "Embase" to screen studies up to November 2024. Studies comparing TACE + TKIs + ICIs with TKIs + ICIs alone in advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results were reported as relative risk (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.

resultsTen studies comprising 1999 patients were included. The combination of TACE + TKIs + ICIs marked improved ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57-2.09, P < 0.00001) and DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.46, P < 0.00001) comparing with TKIs + ICIs alone. OS and PFS were also significantly prolonged in combination group, with HR of 0.55 (95%CI:0.48-0.63, P < 0.00001) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.65-0.82, P < 0.00001), respectively. Adverse events such as pain (RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.28, 95% CI:1.56-3.33, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the TACE + TKIs + ICIs group, though rates of hypertension, diarrhea, and rash were similar between groups. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias for primary outcomes.

conclusionsThe combination of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs significantly improves ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS compared to TKIs and ICIs alone, demonstrating superior efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings provide evidence for the integration of TACE with systemic therapies in the management of HCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsCombined Modality TherapyHumansPrognosisSurvival RateTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsAdverse eventsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMeta-analysis, survivalTransarterial chemoembolizationTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40197348
PMCPMC11974228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.