Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197346›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2025

Healthcare inequities and healthcare providers: we are part of the problem.

Crystal N Campbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Crystal N CampbellDNP Nurse Anesthesia Degree Program Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 2570 48th Street, Sacramento, CA, 95817, United States of America. crncampbell@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States (U.S.) spends the highest amount on healthcare globally, at $12,434 per capita, yet experiences poor health outcomes, including lower life expectancy and higher rates of preventable mortality. With a life expectancy of 76.4 years, the U.S. lags behind other high-income countries, which have an average of 81.1 years. Health inequities, especially among marginalized racial and ethnic groups, contribute significantly to these disparities. Implicit bias among healthcare providers plays a critical role in perpetuating these inequities, resulting in misdiagnoses, undertreatment, and patient mistrust. PURPOSE: This paper examines the role of implicit bias in healthcare disparities, its impact on marginalized populations, and the ethical responsibility of healthcare providers in mitigating bias. It explores the neuroscientific and psychosocial mechanisms of implicit bias and its effects on patient outcomes.

methodsA literature review was conducted using PubMed, APA PsycNet, JSTOR, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The search included peer-reviewed articles from 2008 to 2025 discussing implicit bias in healthcare, its effects on marginalized groups, and evidence-based mitigation strategies. Exclusion criteria included responses and commentaries.

findingsQuantitative findings on implicit bias mitigation strategies show mixed results. Counter-stereotypic strategies and intention-setting interventions reduced Implicit Association Test (IAT) scores by 0.15 at 4 weeks and 0.17 at 8 weeks. However, some strategies, like stereotype replacement and intergroup contact, consistently showed measurable positive effects. Qualitative findings revealed that simulation-based training and perspective-taking significantly increased self-awareness, empathy, and behavioral changes in healthcare providers. Mindfulness meditation and emotional regulation techniques helped reduce stress and bias in high-pressure settings. These findings suggest that while some strategies are effective in the short term, long-term success requires ongoing training, continuous reflection, and practical application in clinical practice.

conclusionHealth inequities in the U.S. are a public health crisis, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. These disparities are preventable, yet persistent due to systemic issues. Healthcare providers must address implicit biases and commit to unbiased, ethical care. Institutions must prioritize health equity through inclusive cultures, comprehensive bias training, and accountability, exemplified by efforts like UW Medicine's bias incident reporting.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHumansUnited StatesBias mitigationDiversityHealthcare disparitiesHealth inequityHealth policyImplicit biasPatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40197346
PMCPMC11978196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.