Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197335›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Patient experiences of waiting for orthopaedic care and priorities for 'waiting well': a qualitative study in a London NHS trust.

Jodie Chan, Sharon Poon, Anna Lawrence-Jones, Fiona O'Driscoll, Carol Waugh, Abiola Awojobi-Johnson, Leila Shepherd, Kate Grailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jodie ChanHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK. j.chan@imperial.ac.uk.
Sharon PoonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anna Lawrence-JonesHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK.
Fiona O'DriscollHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK.
Carol WaughImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Abiola Awojobi-JohnsonHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK.
Leila ShepherdHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK.
Kate GraileyHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Room 1035, London, W2 1 NY, UK.

Funding

National Institute of Health and Care Research PSRC_ NIHR204292North West London Integrated Care Board CPOGBC112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the COVID- 19 pandemic, patients are facing larger waiting lists and longer waiting times than ever before. Long waits for orthopaedic treatment can negatively impact patients' quality of life due to pain, reduced mobility, and the psychological effects of waiting itself. Initial analysis at a London National Health Service (NHS) Trust showed that patients living in the most deprived areas were more likely to face longer waiting times for joint replacement surgery. This study aimed to understand what would support people to live well while waiting for orthopaedic treatment, focusing on those in the most deprived areas.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with patients living in deprived areas in North West London who were currently waiting or had recently waited over 18 weeks for an orthopaedic procedure. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Key insights from this analysis were brought to a co-design workshop, where patients developed targeted and bespoke support initiatives and identified how these might help people to live well while waiting. We worked with two public partners throughout, who shaped the interview questions, analysis, and workshop.

resultsSeven patients were interviewed, and a further six patients participated in the co-design workshop. The interviews identified four immediate impacts of waiting on wellbeing, including physical pain, limitations on daily activities, greater reliance on friends and family, and anxiety around the wait; as well as four long-term consequences of an extended wait time, including physical deterioration, delays of life plans, changes in hopefulness, and reduced trust in the NHS. Additionally, they identified four sub-themes around patients' support needs while waiting: medical support, practical support, informational support, and emotional support. Based on these thematic insights, patients at the workshop developed four potential interventions to support people waiting for orthopaedic treatment.

conclusionThis study highlights the negative impacts that prolonged waits for orthopaedic treatment can have on patients' physical, mental, and social wellbeing, and notes that patients with caring or financial responsibilities may be disproportionately affected. The support needs expressed by patients focused more on acknowledgement of their concerns and management of their expectations by health professionals, rather than on advice around lifestyle changes and coping mechanisms. Our study offers a number of support ideas proposed by patients which can be further developed and implemented by health services to better support patients to live well while waiting for orthopaedic treatment.

Indexed as

Co-designDeprivationHealth equityOrthopaedicsPublic involvementUnderserved groupsWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID40197335
PMCPMC11974020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.