ArticleTrials2025
Evaluation of maxillary miniscrew-anchored molar distalization appliance versus clear aligners in adult with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAngle Class II malocclusion typically presents with overbite, distal molar relationship, and crowding of the upper anterior teeth. The distal movement of the maxillary molars is considered an optimal treatment strategy, as it can circumvent the need for orthodontic extraction. Clear aligners are currently used for molar distalization. However, this approach is not without its limitations, including the loss of anterior tooth anchorage and an extended treatment duration. To address these issues, this study introduces a novel molar distalization appliance. A clinical randomized controlled trial will compare the efficacy of this appliance with clear aligners, specifically assessing differences in the rate of tooth movement.
methodsThis study will recruit 30 patients aged 18-35 with Angle Class II malocclusion, characterized by distal molar relationship, mild to moderate crowding, or protrusion of anterior teeth. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group using a novel molar distalization appliance, and the control group using clear aligners for molar distalization. Both groups will use orthodontic miniscrews as an anchorage, with elastic traction for molar distalization. Cone-beam CT and digital dental models will be collected before orthodontic intervention and after molar distalization for all samples. This study will register pre- and post-treatment images using maxillary bone structures and then analyze three-dimensional tooth movement. The study will further calculate the distance of molar distal movement per unit time as the tooth movement rate and compare whether there is a difference between the experimental and control groups. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial will serve as evidence that the novel molar distalization device, compared to clear aligners, whether offers advantages such as shorter treatment duration and superior control of tooth movement. It can provide a novel method for orthodontic clinical treatment of patients with Angle Class II malocclusion.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2300069122. Registered on 7 March 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.