Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197327›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2025

Missing cell types in single-cell references impact deconvolution of bulk data but are detectable.

Adriana Ivich, Natalie R Davidson, Laurie Grieshober, Weishan Li, Stephanie C Hicks, Jennifer A Doherty, Casey S Greene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integration of Bulk and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analyses in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adriana IvichDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Natalie R DavidsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Laurie GrieshoberHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Weishan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephanie C HicksDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer A DohertyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Casey S GreeneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. casey.s.greene@cuanschutz.com.

Funding

Characterization of high-grade serous ovarian cancer subtypes via single-cell profilingR01CA237170 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOHERTY, JENNIFER A., GREENE, CASEY S · 2019 to 2024
$3.0M
Domain adaptation approaches to unify established and emerging sequencing technologiesR00HG012945 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Natalie Rose Davidson · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Domain adaptation approaches to unify established and emerging sequencing technologiesK99HG012945 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DAVIDSON, NATALIE ROSE · 2023 to 2024
$201k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237170NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG012945NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG012945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in RNA sequencing have expanded our ability to study gene expression profiles of biological samples in bulk tissue and single cells. Deconvolution of bulk data with single-cell references provides the ability to study relative cell-type proportions, but most methods assume a reference is present for every cell type in bulk data. This is not true in all circumstances-cell types can be missing in single-cell profiles for many reasons. In this study, we examine the impact of missing cell types on deconvolution methods.

resultsUsing paired single-cell and single-nucleus data, we simulate realistic scenarios where cell types are missing since single-nucleus RNA sequencing is able to capture cell types that would otherwise be missing in a single-cell counterpart. Single-nucleus sequencing captures cell types absent in single-cell counterparts, allowing us to study their effects on deconvolution. We evaluate three different methods and find that performance is influenced by both the number and similarity of missing cell types. Additionally, missing cell-type profiles can be recovered from residuals using a simple non-negative matrix factorization strategy. We also analyzed real bulk data of cancerous and non-cancerous samples. We observe results consistent with simulation, namely that expression patterns from cell types likely to be missing appear present in residuals.

conclusionsWe expect our results to provide a starting point for those developing new deconvolution methods and help improve their to better account for the presence of missing cell types. Our results suggest that deconvolution methods should consider the possibility of missing cell types.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID40197327
PMCPMC11974051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.