ArticleBMC health services research2025
Assessment of drug utilization evaluation and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIrrational prescription of medication is a common issue in clinical practice, particularly for eye disorders that can affect vision. This study aimed to assess the prescribing practices, drug utilization, and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.
methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted at the ophthalmology department of the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from March 2024 to June 2024. Quantitative data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, and chart review was then entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed and Binary logistic regression analyses identified factors influencing post-dispensing knowledge, with a significance level of p < 0.05 and results presented with 95% confidence intervals. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed thematically using OpenCode software version 4.2.
resultsMost respondents were elderly and male, with a higher prevalence of ocular diseases. Ophthalmic medications were predominantly solutions (53.2%), with antibacterial drugs (41.2%), especially Tetracycline, being the most common. Fixed-dose combination drugs were primarily steroid-antibiotic combinations. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.43, with 90.37% of prescriptions being generic and 66.8% from the National Essential Drug List. Strength, dose, frequency, and duration were recorded in 68.3%, 31.5%, 92.4%, and 31.5% of the prescriptions, respectively. Post-dispensing knowledge was good in 38% of the patients, and 11.5% used medication in both eyes despite infection in only one. Patients with a diploma or higher education (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.35, 4.46) were more likely to have better medication knowledge than those unable to read or write.
conclusionMost prescribing indicators were below the e World Health Organization's recommended standards, except for the number of drugs per prescription and the dispensing time. In addition, most ophthalmic prescriptions lacked adequate and complete prescribing information, and most patients had insufficient post-dispensing knowledge. These findings highlight the urgent need to improve prescribing practices, enhance counseling, and implement targeted educational programs to ensure safer and more effective ophthalmic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.