ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Influence of statin intervention on peripheral neuropathy in patients treated with anticancer drugs identified from the insurer database.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStatins, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, possess neuroprotective properties. Given the potential neuroprotective properties of statins and their prevalent use in clinical settings, we aimed to investigate their impact on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in Japan by assessing both their safety and efficacy in this context.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using the Japan Medical Data Centre database, which includes data from 2005 to 2021. We included patients who underwent anticancer therapy and were categorized into non-statin (10,920) and statin (1,537) groups. These groups were matched using a propensity score, resulting in 2,548 non-statin and 1,274 statin users. The primary endpoints were the incidence of CIPN post-first prescription of each anticancer drug and overall survival.
resultsTreatment with statins did not increase the incidence of CIPN (non-statin 27.2% vs. statin 28.4%, P = 0.443). Nevertheless, the incidence of CIPN was significantly high among women (non-statin 28.0% vs. statin 33.2%, P = 0.025). Overall survival was not impacted by statin use (hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI: 0.83-1.16, P = 0.8846). Among men treated with paclitaxel, we observed an improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.92; P = 0.0110).
conclusionsThe use of statins in patients with cancer was not associated with CIPN incidence. However, in men receiving paclitaxel treatment, statins may be linked to improved overall survival. Further studies are necessary to clarify the factors influencing prognosis and CIPN severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.