ArticleBMC oral health2025
Evaluation of the effect of reverse curved spee Ni-Ti wires with different depths in MBT and Roth brackets on mandibular teeth during leveling and alignment using finite element analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Force Distribution, Tooth Movement, and Mechanical Performance.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Correction of the curve of spee using clear aligner therapy: A finite element analysis of three lower anterior intrusion protocols.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of our study is to analyze the forces generated by reverse curve archwires with three different depths and two different dimensions for Roth-type brackets and MBT-type brackets through finite element analysis (FEA) to assess their effects. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study involves modeling wires of different dimensions and depths (20 mm, 25 mm and 30 mm) for Roth-type brackets with 0.018''slot size and MBT-type brackets with 0.022''slot size. 12 linear static analyses were conducted under specific loading and boundary conditions to evaluate tooth movements along the X, Y, and Z axes, total displacement, and von Mises stresses on the periodontal ligament (PDL).
results0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025''and 0.021 × 0.025'' dimensions and 30 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with 0.017 × 0.025'' and 0.016 × 0.022'' wire and 30 mm depth applied the most aggressive forces, leading to high displacement and PDL stress. In contrast, 0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025'' dimensions and 20 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 25 mm depth, 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 20 mm depth demonstrated more conservative force applications.
conclusionThis comparative analysis of 12 different models demonstrates that varying orthodontic forces have a significant impact on both tooth movement and PDL stress. These findings highlight the significance of selecting the appropriate model based on the patient's periodontal health to ensure orthodontic treatments are performed effectively and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.