ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Cerebral morphometric alterations predict the outcome of migraine diagnosis and subtyping: a radiomics analysis.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 200 most influential publications in migraine research: a bibliometric mapping of the intellectual landscape.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Cracking the Code: Computational Image Analysis Tools for Histopathological and Morphometric Insights.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to identify cerebral radiomic features related to migraine diagnosis and subtyping into migraine with aura (MwA) and migraine without aura (MwoA) and to develop predictive models based on these markers.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed MR imaging from 88 migraine patients (32 MwA and 56 MwoA) and 49 healthy control subjects (HCs). Features representing the gray matter morphometry and diffusion properties were extracted from participants via histogram analysis. These features were put through an all-relevant feature selection procedure within cross-validation loops to identify features with significant discriminative power for migraine diagnosis and subtyping. Based on the selected features, the predictive ability of the random forest models constructed from the previous sample was tested in an independent sample of 30 patients (10 MwA) and 17 HCs.
resultNo overall differences in total brain volume or gray matter volume were revealed between patients and HCs, or between MwA and MwoA (all P values > 0.05). Six features significantly differed between patients and HCs for migraine diagnosis, and four features distinguished MwA from MwoA for subtyping (all P values < 0.001). Four features were significantly correlated with headache severity score (all P values < 0.01). Based on these relevant features, the random forest models achieved accuracies of 80.9% in distinguishing patients from HCs and 76.7% in differentiating MwA from MwoA in the testing cohort.
conclusionOur findings suggest cerebral radiomic alterations in migraine patients may potentially serve as a biomarker to assist in migraine diagnosis and subtyping, contributing to personalized treatment strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.