ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2025
Analysis of the triage value of multigene methylation testing for CIN2 + in hrHPV-positive patients.
Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of DNA methylation markers for diagnosing cervical precancer and cancer: A single-center cross-sectional study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- EVX2 methylation assay enables risk assessment of cervical cancer in high-risk HPV-infected individuals.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Advances in the application of gene methylation detection in cervical cancer screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of DNA Methylation Markers for Detecting Cervical Precancer and Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- PAX1/JAM3 methylation-a novel biomarker for early detection and accurate management of cervical adenocarcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- Comparative performance of hrHPV testing and PAX1/ZNF671 methylation in triaging women with abnormal cytology: a study of paired urine, vaginal and cervical scrape samples.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- DNMT Enzymes and Their Impact on Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation as a detection and triage method for triage of high risk HPV-Positive women in cervical cancer screening.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the triage value of multigene methylation testing for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and above (CIN2+) in high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positive patients.
methods634 hrHPV-positive cases were selected from the gynecology outpatient clinic at Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center between July 2022 and April 2024. Out of these, 274 patients were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 360 patients were evaluated for hrHPV, cytology, histopathology, and DNA methylation across multiple loci. These patients were categorized into five groups based on their histopathological diagnoses: control group, CIN1 group, CIN2 group, CIN3 group, and cervical cancer (CC) group. The triage value of multigene methylation testing for CIN2 + in hrHPV-positive patients was evaluated by calculating the positivity of candidate gene methylation, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and other performance indicators.
resultsAmong the 17 candidate genes (ST6GALNAC5, PAX1, AJAP1, CDKN2A, ZNF671, GATA4, MAL, POU4F3, RXFP3, JAM3, MIR124, LHX8, SOX1, ASTN1, SOX17, DLX1, and ITGA4), ITGA4 methylation testing demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy for detecting CIN2 + lesions, with an AUC of 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.806-0.925). This method exhibited a sensitivity of 75.32% (95% CI: 0.647-0.836) and a specificity of 96.45% (95% CI: 0.936-0.981). The combined methylation test, which included all candidate genes, showed a higher specificity of 97.87% (95% CI: 0.954-0.990) compared to any individual gene methylation test. However, its sensitivity was lower, at 72.73% (95% CI: 0.619-0.814). Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of combining HPV16/18 testing with all candidate gene methylation tests for the diagnosis of CIN2 + was significantly greater than when HPV16/18 testing was combined with cytology. This combined approach had an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI: 0.858-0.955), a sensitivity of 72.73% (95% CI: 0.619-0.814), and a specificity of 98.58% (95% CI: 0.964-0.995).
conclusionMultigene methylation testing is an efficient triage test for CIN2 + in hrHPV-positive patients and has potential value in clinical practice. Combined HPV16/18 and multigene methylation testing for the triage of CIN2 + is significantly better than combined HPV16/18 and cytology testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.