ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Prevalence and transmission patterns of Mycoplasma bovis in comingled Holstein dairy heifers from two different parent farms.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bovine Tuberculosis in Raw Milk: A Herd-Level Prevalence Study by PCR and ELISA Testing in Sylhet Region of Bangladesh.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Risk factors for postcalving intramammary infection withJDS communications · 2026Article
- Bovine Respiratory Mycoplasmas and the Commensal-Pathogen Continuum: A Systematic Review of Vaccines and Diagnostic Approaches.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMycoplasma bovis probably enters dairy herds when carrier animals are introduced. Comingled calves that become subclinical M. bovis carriers could promote cross-dairy transmission. A prospective cohort study in Holstein heifers from two unrelated herds (Farms A and B previously M. bovis positive and negative, respectively) comingled at a facility raising only their calves assessed: 1). prevalence of asymptomatic M. bovis infection; 2). associations between four anatomic sites (nares, eyes, ear canal, vagina; M. bovis culture with PCR confirmation). Fifteen calves per farm were enrolled every 4 months. Swabbing solutions were first collected at parent farms, thereafter monthly for 6 months, then quarterly to 21 months.
resultsThree heifers from each dairy were lost after enrollment leaving 144 heifers (72 per farm) in the analysis. On day 1, a Farm A calf vaginal sample was the single M. bovis positive. While comingled, positives increased dramatically. Days of age to first positive were not different between farms (Farm A median = 109, range 42-561 days; Farm B median = 110, range 33-404 days; P = 0.96). Overall, 125/144 heifers yielded 634 positive samples, intranasal (46.7%), ocular (25.7%), vaginal (17.8%), ear canal (9.8%). The most common combinations were eye/nose (55/634, 43.3%) and nose/vagina (21/634, 16.5%). Intranasal positives increased exponentially at 2-3 months of age, plateauing over 4-10 months, and were more frequent than non-nose (Incidence Rate Ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.41-1.47; P < 0.001). Positive combinations involving the nose temporally lagged the intranasal alone positives, but eventually reached similar frequencies. After returning to the parent farms, frequency of intranasal positives declined more rapidly than did non-nose.
conclusionsM. bovis was cultured from all sites, but the nose appears most critical for transmission. Once intranasal carriage escalated, virtually all calves were subsequently positive at least once at one or more sites, indicating how readily asymptomatic M. bovis can disseminate in a population of animals and potentially manifest as clinical disease later in life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.