ArticleBMC public health2025
Motivation to continue and the value of care work among French Red Cross volunteers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-governmental organizations support state-based responses to health emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Their capacity to respond effectively to such emergencies depends on worker and volunteer willingness to engage in high-risk conditions. Some studies examine volunteer and salaried worker motivation to continue in high-risk situations, but offer limited insight into how workers themselves understand and act on workplace cultures, governance, risks, and care work, as well as their consequences for motivation to continue. This study investigated drivers of motivation to continue and appraisals of the value of care work among French Red Cross (FRC) personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2021.
methodsWe conducted online quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. We used a novel analytical approach employing unsupervised clustering with BERTopic-a transformer-based language model-for analyzing open-text survey responses. This method, alongside descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses, illuminated underlying themes in participants' intentions to continue care work. Thematic analyses situated these intentions within broader discussions about FRC work culture and the value of care work during a pandemic.
resultsAnalysis of responses from 2,460 online surveys and 40 online interviews revealed a decrease in the proportion of salaried workers expressing an intention to continue, whereas the proportion among volunteers remained stable across surveys conducted between June 2020 and June 2021. Multivariate analysis linked declining motivation to continue with heightened anxious state and increased motivation to continue with perceived readiness and in-person communication. Qualitative findings reframed our question about FRC actor motivation to continue. "Motivation to continue", whether declining or intensifying, reflected a rethinking of care work. For some, remote work sapped their care work of its value. Others perceived their labor to have high value and thus worked beyond their physical and emotional capacities.
conclusionsAlthough anxious state and risk perceptions influenced FRC actor motivation to continue during the COVID-19 pandemic, this motivation to continue must be understood in a context of changing values of voluntary and salaried care work that sustain the health and wellbeing of a population. Studies of future health emergencies could extend this reasearch to yield greater insight into sociocultural and political economic logics that sustain care work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.