Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197243›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Effectiveness of nurse-led transitional care interventions for adult patients discharged from acute care hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chizuko Sakashita, Emi Endo, Erika Ota, Hiromi Oku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chizuko SakashitaNursing Department, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan. c.saka@kitasato-u.ac.jp.
Emi EndoGraduate School of Nursing Doctoral Program, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Erika OtaGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi OkuGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the guidance of healthcare policy and advances in medical technology, the average length of stay in hospitals continues to decrease. In this context, expectations for nurse-led interventions for patients discharged home are increasing. However, few systematic reviews of nurse-led transitional care have focused on patients discharged from acute care hospitals. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of nurse-led transitional care interventions on readmission rates, unscheduled outpatient-visit rates, and quality of life (QOL) of adult patients discharged from acute care hospitals, compared with usual care.

methodsFour electronic databases were searched for articles published through October 2023. Individual and cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effectiveness of nurse-led transitional care interventions were included. Independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

resultsSixteen RCTs were included. In a meta-analysis of RCTs with readmission rates as the outcome, readmission rates were significantly reduced in the intervention group when the data collection period exceeded 12 weeks (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P = 0.01; I² = 66%; certainty: moderate). The rate of emergency room visits was also significantly reduced in the intervention group (RR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P = 0.0003; I² = 0%; certainty: high). QOL measured with the SF-36 was significantly higher after 5 weeks (MD 1.27; 95% CI, 0.52-2.02; P = 0.0009, I² = 0%; certainty: low) and after 6 weeks (MD 2.46; 95% CI, 1.67-3.25; P = 0.00001; I² = 19%; certainty: low), both showing a possibility of improvement in the intervention group. However, the number of studies and samples included in the meta-analysis, particularly for readmission rates and QOL, were small, and the results should be interpreted with caution due to differences in subjects, institutions, and types of interventions.

conclusionNurse-led transitional care interventions effectively reduced readmission and emergency department visit rates and improved QOL in adult patients discharged from acute care hospitals.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisNurse-led interventionQuality of lifeReadmissionTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID40197243
PMCPMC11974112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.