Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197238›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

The hyperopia reserve in 3- to 6- years-old preschool children in North China: the Beijing hyperopia reserve research.

Jianing Pu, Yuxin Fang, Zhen Zhou, Wei Chen, Jianping Hu, Shanshan Jin, Xinli Liu, Lihua Wang, Jingjing Feng, Huan Tong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jianing Pu *Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuxin Fang *Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhen ZhouSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei ChenMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China. chenweidgj@163.com.
Jianping HuBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Shanshan JinBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xinli LiuMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Lihua WangMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Jingjing FengMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Huan TongMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Shanshan XingMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Haidian District, No. 53 Suzhou Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Ya Xing WangBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yonghong JiaoBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing. No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. yhjiao2001@aliyun.com.

Funding

Capital Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Research and Translational Medicine Application 2020-2024, project number Z201100005520034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical relevanceIn recent years, the concept of hyperopia reserve, defined as a physiological hyperopic refractive status preceding emmetropia and myopia, has gained increasing attention. and raised awareness about myopia. This concept has become of interest to both parents and practitioners.

backgroundTo report the distribution of refractive errors and ocular biometry in a large scale of preschool children in Beijing, in North China. The distribution of hyperopia reserve and its associated factors were also further investigated.

methodsThis study presents baseline data from Beijing Hyperopia Reserve Research (BHRR), which enrolled 2109 preschool children from 22 randomly selected kindergartens. Cycloplegic refraction was performed for all children. Hyperopia reserve was defined as a spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) greater than zero. Parents completed a questionnaire about the severity of refractive status (normal; mild myopia <-3D; moderate myopia ≥-3D and ≤-6D; high myopia >-6D) and their children's indoor and outdoor activity times.

resultsThe mean SER was + 1.11 ± 0.97D, and the mean axial length was 22.25 + 0.73 mm in all preschool children. The overall prevalence of myopia was 3.7%, with age-specific rates of 2.8%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 5.2%, respectively. A total of 1932 children (91.6%) had hyperopia reserve, yet only 24.1% of children had age-adjusted normal hyperopia reserve. Regression analysis showed that maintaining hyperopia reserve was associated with sex (boy as reference, OR = 1.7, P = 0.005), mild myopic group parents (Father: OR = 1.7, P = 0.003; Mother: OR = 2.2, P < 0.001), increased outdoor activity time (OR = 1.3, P = 0.031) and reduced study time (OR = 0.8, P = 0.025).

conclusionsThe present study provided a comprehensive database on the refractive status and ocular biometry of preschool children aged 3-6 years in Beijing, North China. Although most children maintained hyperopia reserve, the majority had age-adjusted hyperopia reserve deficiencies. Early intervention, particularly for children with parents exhibiting severe myopia may be warranted.

Indexed as

HyperopiaRefraction, OcularBeijingBiometryChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansMaleMyopiaPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual AcuityCycloplegic refractionHyperopia reserveMyopiaOcular biometryOutdoor activityParental myopiaPreschool children

Identifiers

PMID40197238
PMCPMC11974099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.