ArticleBMC public health2025
Surveillance via wastewater monitoring and nasal self-collection of specimens (The SWANSS Study): a CFIR-informed qualitative study with key carceral and healthcare stakeholders.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplementing public health interventions can be challenging in carceral settings. Jails are institutions with the shortest lengths of stay, resulting in frequent turnover and constantly shifting populations. Jails had particularly acute challenges during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic when incarcerated persons were highly susceptible to infection and severe disease. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) and nasal self-testing (NST) as a combined strategy of COVID-19 surveillance in Fulton County Jail (FCJ), Atlanta, Georgia. Implications for efficient and effective infectious disease testing among this susceptible population are relevant for ongoing surveillance of current endemic pathogens and future epidemics.
methodsWe utilized a multilevel, theory-informed qualitative approach to conduct semi-structured one-on-one and small group interviews with nine distinct jail stakeholder groups: jail custody leadership, administrators, officers, maintenance workers, Georgia Department of Health's COVID-19 testing contractor, jail health care leaders, nursing staff, laboratory leadership, and staff. Interview guides and analyses were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used Applied Thematic Analysis to identify domains within CFIR reflecting barriers and facilitators to WBS combined with NST in large urban jail settings.
resultsTwelve interviews were conducted with administrative, healthcare, maintenance, custody, and laboratory personnel from July 2022 to November 2022. Seven CFIR constructs were identified as barriers, sixteen as facilitators, and one as a neutral factor for the implementation of WBS combined with NST. Jail stakeholders underscored the relative advantage of self-testing, highlighted limited resources, and expressed concerns for the sustainability of WBS due to competing priorities. Many of the stakeholders within the jail setting that were interviewed had hierarchical organizational structures, which made decision-making processes regarding WBS and NST complex and challenging to implement.
conclusionsGiven the political, structural, and organizational factors in a jail setting, innovations such as NST and WBS require a rigorous implementation strategy supported by ongoing engagement and collaboration with a multitude of stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.