ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy effectively diagnosed with dacryoendoscopy: a report of two cases.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dacryoendoscopy: Historical development, philosophical foundation, and clinical perspective.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe described two cases of lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy (LDAK) wherein lacrimal irrigation tests revealed no abnormalities, and there were few signs and symptoms suggestive of lacrimal drainage pathway disease. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1 involved a 66-year-old woman with Sjögren's syndrome who presented with corneal perforation in her left eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed a non-infiltrative corneal ulcer and perforation in the inferior peripheral cornea. LDAK was suspected; however, there were minimal signs of lacrimal drainage pathway disease. Despite treatment with contact lenses and topical steroids, there was no improvement. Dacryoendoscopy was performed, revealing multiple concretions within the canaliculus. LDAK caused by lacrimal canaliculitis was confirmed, and the corneal ulcer rapidly re-epithelialized after removing the concretions. Case 2 involved a 78-year-old woman with Sjögren's syndrome who presented with epiphora in her right eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed two non-infiltrative ulcers in the inferior cornea, one of which had perforated. LDAK was suspected, but there were minimal signs of lacrimal drainage pathway disease. Dacryoendoscopy was performed, revealing concretions within the lacrimal sac and confirming chronic dacryocystitis. After removing the concretions, the corneal ulcer rapidly re-epithelialized.
conclusionsWe encountered two cases of LDAK that presented with minimal signs of lacrimal drainage pathway disease. When LDAK is suspected, dacryoendoscopy is a valuable tool for diagnosing lacrimal drainage pathway disease and removing concretions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.