ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Radiomic analysis using T1 mapping in gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI for liver function assessment.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the value of a T1 mapping-based radiomic model for evaluating liver function.
methodsFrom September 2020 to October 2022, 163 patients were retrospectively recruited and categorized into normal liver function group, chronic liver disease group without cirrhosis, Child‒Pugh class A group, and Child‒Pugh class B and C group. Patients were randomly split into training and testing sets. Radiomic features were extracted from T1 mapping images taken both pre- and post-contrast injection, as well as during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Radiomic models were constructed to stratify chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and decision curve analysis.
resultsThe K-Nearest Neighbors model demonstrated the best generalization across native T1 map, HBP T1 maps and HBP images. In the training set, based on native T1 maps, it achieved accuracies of 0.83, 0.86, and 0.86 in distinguishing chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis, with corresponding AUCs of 0.92, 0.92, and 0.95. In the testing set, the accuracies were 0.75, 0.89, and 0.71, with AUCs of 0.79, 0.92, and 0.83, respectively. When using HBP images with T1 maps, the accuracies were 0.72, 0.90, and 0.72 in the testing set in identifying chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis with AUCs of 0.82, 0.93, and 0.79, respectively.
conclusionRadiomic analysis based on native T1 map, and HBP with or without T1 map images shows promising potential for liver function assessment, particularly in distinguishing cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.