Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40197205›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025

Prediction of new-onset migraine using clinical-genotypic data from the HUNT Study: a machine learning analysis.

Fahim Faisal, Antonios Danelakis, Marte-Helene Bjørk, Bendik Winsvold, Manjit Matharu, Parashkev Nachev, Knut Hagen, International Headache Genetics Consortium, Erling Tronvik, Anker Stubberud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fahim FaisalNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Antonios DanelakisNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Marte-Helene BjørkNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bendik WinsvoldNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Manjit MatharuNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Parashkev NachevUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Knut HagenNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
International Headache Genetics Consortium
Erling TronvikNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anker StubberudNorhead Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. anker.stubberud@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is associated with a range of symptoms and comorbid disorders and has a strong genetic basis, but the currently identified risk loci only explain a small portion of the heritability, often termed the "missing heritability". We aimed to investigate if machine learning could exploit the combination of genetic data and general clinical features to identify individuals at risk for new-onset migraine.

methodThis study was a population-based cohort study of adults from the second and third Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT2 and HUNT3). Migraine was captured in a validated questionnaire and based on modified criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) and participants underwent genome-wide genotyping. The primary outcome was new-onset migraine defined as a change in disease status from headache-free in HUNT2 to migraine in HUNT3. The migraine risk variants identified in the largest GWAS meta-analysis of migraine were used to identify genetic input features for the models. The general clinical features included demographics, selected comorbidities, medication and stimulant use and non-headache symptoms as predictive factors. Several standard machine learning architectures were constructed, trained, optimized and scored with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). The best model during training and validation was used on unseen test sets. Different methods for model explainability were employed.

resultsA total of 12,995 individuals were included in the predictive modelling (491 new-onset cases). A total of 108 genetic variants and 67 general clinical variables were included in the models. The top performing decision-tree classifier achieved a test set AUC of 0.56 when using only genotypic data, 0.68 when using only clinical data and 0.72 when using both genetic and clinical data. Combining the genotype only and clinical data only models resulted in a lower predictivity with an AUC of 0.67. The most important clinical features were age, marital status and work situation as well as several genetic variants.

conclusionThe combination of genotype and routine demographic and non-headache clinical data correctly predict the new onset of migraine in approximately 2 out of 3 cases, supporting that there are important genotypic-phenotypic interactions partaking in the new-onset of migraine.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMigraine DisordersAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorway

Identifiers

PMID40197205
PMCPMC11977938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.