ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026
The 'hub' model for colorectal surgery: a viable paradigm shift?
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral abdominal laparoscopy with real-time quantitative tissue oxygenation imaging: a live porcine study.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNationally, in the aftermath of the first COVID-19 lockdown, the waiting list for elective surgery is approximately 7 million. To ameliorate an evolving crisis and improve system resilience, the Royal College of Surgeons of England proposed a 'New Deal for Surgery', promoting COVID-light sites and elective hubs. We evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety and sustainability of the hub model at a large National Health Service trust.
methodsAll major elective colorectal operations performed at the hub between 8 March 2021 and 8 March 2022 were included for analysis. Pertinent data on patient demographics, operative performance and postoperative outcomes were analysed using SPSS 27.
resultsIn total, 401 cases were analysed. There was one same-day cancellation because of the unavailability of beds (0.2%). Median distance displacement for patients for their primary surgery was +3.2 miles. Twenty-one patients (5.2%) required postoperative blood transfusion. One patient had nosocomial COVID-19 (0.2%), severe complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 were observed in 33 patient (8.2%) and transfer-out for higher level care occurred in 34 cases (8.5%). Forty-six 30-day readmissions (11.5%) and two deaths (0.4%) were noted. Median length of stay was 6 days.
conclusionsThe volume of major colorectal surgery at the hub, with acceptable incidence of major complication, transfer-out and minimal patient displacement, attests to the efficacy and safety of the new model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.